Leadership Philosophy
Ahneka Valdois
Azusa Pacific University
Leadership Philosophy
I have a somewhat conflicted relationship with
the idea of leadership. Northouse (2013) provides an overview of different
leadership theories. A general, generic definition that he gives of leadership
is “a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to
achieve a common goal” (p. 5). Even the general simplicity of this definition
gives me qualms because I question the morality of influencing other people.
How can I know that what I think really is the best way? In influencing others,
I privilege my understanding of a situation over theirs. One of the only ways
that I can justify taking such a position toward others is through my
commitment to be obedient to God. Obedience to God makes leaders effective
because it motivates us to have the faith and the courage to take risks, and it
teaches us humility and compassion for others. Obedience to God in service to
others is the model that Jesus gave us for leadership.
Influencing
Others: A Moral Dilemma
The responsibility of leadership is not a
light burden. In discussing transformational leadership, Bass makes the
argument that transformational leadership can never be negative and that any
leadership that leads to negative outcomes is only “pseudotransformational” (as
cited in Northouse, 2013, p. 187). In making this statement, Bass moves
leadership from being a value neutral activity to being a value positive
activity. Most people who take leadership positions do so in the belief that
their leadership is positive. Even notorious leaders like Adolph Hitler probably
held this idea. So who gets to decide what is real leadership and what actions
do not count as leadership? Where do the values come from? On what basis can
anyone prove that their leadership is value positive and not
pseudotransformational? I really struggle with these questions in regard to my
own leadership.
So often leadership seems to end up being
a matter of proving oneself and impressing others. If others do not think a leader
is capable, then he or she cannot influence others and they will not follow even
when the end will be productive for everyone. There is a song that describes
the way people tend to interact:
Sweet
dreams are made of this. Who am I to disagree? I’ve travel the world and the
seven seas. Everybody’s looking for something. Some of them want to use you.
Some of them want to be used by you. Some of them want to abuse you. Some of
them want to be abused. (Lennox & Stewart, 1983, track 1).
Despite its cynicism, these lyrics are
depressingly accurate in regard to the way most people can be influenced.
If I did not align my views of leadership
with my faith perspective, I would be far more manipulative in my leadership
strategies. I know pretty well how people think, and I could be quite skillful
at getting them to do what I wanted them to do by playing them against each
other and by working on their vanity and fear. Even now, I sometimes get very
frustrated when people block change efforts I am trying to make because of
irrational fear or a desire to be in control. So many people live in denial,
and they often do not respond well to me noticing their hypocrisy. Faced with
this reality, I struggle with the moral responsibility of how to influence such
people in a way that will honor God.
Because of the pressure that this concern
puts on me, I appreciate the servant leadership model set forth by Greenleaf
(Northouse, 2013). Servant leadership, at its core, according to Greenleaf, is “then
natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first” (Northouse, 2013, p.220). Being motivated by others’ welfare
seems like a clearly value positive motivation, unlike trying to actualize one’s
vision of a better world which may or may not be “better” according to other
sets of values.
Some critics have noted, however, this
focus on altruism can seem like a utopian concept because it does not take into
account practical considerations like concern for production and goal setting
(Northouse, 2013). Sometimes always accommodating others leads nowhere. To
balance this weakness, I think servant leadership must be carried out in
obedience to God. It is one of the intrinsic attributes of God to create growth
so that if we are in obedience to him, more practical considerations will be
addressed naturally. As Jesus notes, “Seek first the kingdom of God and all of
these things will be added unto you” (Matthew 6:33, English Standard Version).
My highest value as a leader is the desire
to demonstrate this obedience to God. I believe in a God-given hierarchy, in
which I am under authority, and I owe it to those who follow me to accurately
reflect the authority that I am under. In his example of prayer, Jesus requests
of God, “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven” (Matthew 6:10b, English
Standard Version). I believe that, to the extent our world conforms to God’s
will, heaven comes to earth. God has called us to be the change agents who
transform others through our example, but first we must really know and be
submitted to his will ourselves.
Because of my faith, and my belief in my
calling as a leader, I do not believe that I have the right to manipulate
people. I believe that God has called me to leave my ego behind in leadership
roles. This is a really difficult thing for me to do because I recognize how
unreasonable people can be. I have to trust God that He will work in their
hearts if my change efforts are really within his will. Jesus
modeled this process for us when he was on earth, showing us both how to both
serve others and become a source for radical change.
Creating
Deep Change
Leadership cannot be only a matter of
simply negating oneself in favor of others. Leaders need to be people who can
stand for something positive in the face of negative influences—even if those
negative influences come from the very people they are trying to serve. Quinn’s
(2008) ideas about deep change describe many of my intuitive beliefs about this
side of leadership. I think he is right that we need to be ready to take risks
and make sacrifices in order to see change in our world. Jesus models Quinn’s
idea throughout his life.
Leadership means taking responsibility for
oneself. Quinn (2008) describes the process of choosing life. He says that most
individuals choose slow death because it seems safer to them. Quinn states, “Few people are very good at
reinventing themselves. They often choose the destructive alternative of
staying very busy” (location 272). I tend to be an exception to this rule
because one of my top strengths in being restorative (Rath, 2007). I have spent
my life on a journey of personal renovation. However, this kind of
self-renovation is only the first step in effective leadership.
This tendency, in and of itself, does not
make an effective leader. Quinn (2008) describes ways of coping with
organizational slow death. Many follow the “peace and pay” strategy, where they
keep their head down and slowly let the death of the organization kill them
also. I have always been too opinionated and critical to accept this strategy.
Perhaps that resistance is simply the result of my personality. However, Quinn
also outlines a strategy called the “active exit” strategy. I have often used
this strategy. I have left so many organizations and situations because I could
not be bothered to challenge the status quo. In many cases, I did not believe
that I had the power to change the situation, but it may have been that I
merely was not willing to face the personal risks involved. This avoidance of
the slow death of others is not effective leadership.
Leadership means taking responsibility for
others. Quinn (2008) notes, at one point in his book, that managers choose
“short term personal survival over long term collective responsibility”
(Location 227). For many years, this attitude was also my approach. I have not
been very good at taking responsibility for the collective. When others reject
my ideas and my problem-solving mentality, I simply retreated and disengaged,
mentally planning my exit. Recently, I was challenged on this tendency by a
colleague and realized that neglecting to offer what skills God had given me
was not merely a matter of doing no harm. It was a matter of abdicating my
responsibility toward my community.
Being an effective leader requires a
person to understand and be secure in their own identity and values. Quinn (2008)
calls this characteristic integrity. It is easy for me to discount my own
vision of reality. People do not like it when I point out to them the problems
that they do not want to deal with. Also because of my restorative lens, I have
a lot of self-doubt. When other people fail to see my perspective, it is easy
for me to believe that maybe I am the one who does not see clearly. When this
fear is combined with the fear of negative fallout because I am trying to take
a stand, the option to just back away from the situation is very easy to make.
They only way for me to really stand my ground is to know, beyond a shadow of a
doubt, that my vision is important to me and that God wants me to fight for it.
Transforming
the World through Sacrificial Obedience
This decision to stand by one’s values and
vision is a matter of faith. Recently, I had a situation where my vision was
challenged. I was accused of being dishonest and unteachable. Without my
conviction that God wanted me to stand my ground, I would have backed away from
that argument and tried to do what I could to placate the people who disagreed
with me, not because I was convinced by their argument but because I was afraid
of the repercussions and unsure of my own motives. I believe, though, that God
is calling me to stand up and face these risks that come as a natural result of
who he has called me to be. Until I can do stand my ground in this area, I
cannot be an effective leader.
Jesus is our model of a truly effect deep
change agent. Quinn (2008) states:
Empowered
leaders are the only ones who can induce real change. They can forcefully
communicate at a level beyond telling. By having the courage to change
themselves, they model the behavior they are asking of others. Clearly
understood by almost everyone, one, this message, based in integrity, is
incredibly powerful. It builds trust and credibility and helps others confront
the risk of empowering themselves. (Kindle Locations 386-388).
Jesus modeled the change that he asked us
to make in our lives in the most dramatic and powerful way possible: by being
obedient to death on the cross. Jesus said, “Unless a grain of wheat falls into
the ground and dies, it remains alone, but if it dies, it bears much fruit”
(John 12:24, English Standard Version). This verse is one of the most
compelling change statements ever made. Quinn (2008) echoes this idea in his
theory of deep change when he talks about the heroic journey. Jesus modeled
that heroic journey in his life, death and resurrection. We are all called to
follow his example, and the most authentic and effective way that I can be a
leader is by answering that call, by taking up my cross and following him.
Jesus changed his world because he was
willing to be obedient to God and make the ultimate sacrifice. As Christians,
we are called to do the same thing. Jesus said, “The Son can do of his own
accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father does,
that the Son does likewise” (John 5:19, English Standard Version).
In every step of his ministry, Jesus was led by the Spirit. He told his
disciples, “I am the vine, you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in
him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing”
(John 15:5, English Standard Version). My challenge as a leader is to be
sensitive to the way that God is leading. This sensitivity requires me to
constantly look to God for guidance and wisdom about the choices I make
regarding how I spend my time, who I talk to, and what projects I undertake.
Paul tells us that “in all these things,
we are more than conquerors through him who loved us,” which I think means that
when we are fighting the battles that God is asking us to fight, we will win. I
hope that my contribution as a leader will be to enact God’s will on the earth
and bring life—because that is his heart for the world. It is difficult for me
to have a vision beyond that, except to say that I believe that God has called
me to “feed the hungry and give [myself] to the afflicted” (Isaiah 58:10, English
Standard Version). I cannot give anything that I do not first receive, however,
and that is a journey, not a destination, a matter of being available, not a
matter of having a master plan or taking control.
Investing
in Others’ Leadership
Encouraging others to develop as leaders
is an important part of effective leadership. Quinn (2008) describes this
process, as part of deep change. We influence others to change through our own
example of integrity and courage. Beer, Eisenstat, and Spector (2011) note how
often change movements overlook the greatest resource a leader has: the
strengths and knowledge of his or her followers. Inspiring others to step up
and contribute their own knowledge and skill to create something better is what
gives any change movement strength and sustainability. We will not be able to
solve the “wicked problems” of today’s society until we can motivate others to
join us in taking responsibility for them (Rittel & Webber, 1973).
Servant leadership is an effective model
in this regard. Lacroix and Verdorfer (2017) found that the right kind of
servant leadership reduces leadership avoidance. Jesus also demonstrated this
strength of servant leadership when he empowered his disciples to take his
gospel out into the world. In Greenleaf’s definition of servant leadership, he
asks, “Do those who are served grow as persons…? What is the effect on the
least privileged in society; will they benefit or at least not be further
deprived?” (as cited in Northouse, 2013, p. 220). These are the questions that guide servant
leadership efforts and they are deeply important to me. Am I helping to create
an environment where people grow and build each other up? Am I inspiring and
challenging others to do the same? These questions are my main preoccupation as
a leader. Jesus modeled the kind of leadership that could be passed on, as he
did for his disciples. It is my mission to follow his example.
I hope that people will one day be able to
say that God did amazing things through me. I want them to be impressed by how
much God can do with someone who is intrinsically not that special or unique.
In fact, I hope people forget about me and only remember the work. I hope that
the change that I help bring about will transform the world even if it is only
in the most subtle way.
References
Beer,
M., Eisenstat, R.A., & Spector, B. (2011). Why change programs don’t
produce change. In J. P. Kotter (Ed.), HBR's
10 Must Reads on Change Management [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/
Johansson,
F. (2006). Medici Effect: What You Can
Learn from Elephants and Epidemics [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/
Lacroix,
M., & Pircher Verdorfer, A. (2017). Can Servant Leaders Fuel the Leadership
Fire? The Relationship between Servant Leadership and Followers’ Leadership
Avoidance. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 6. doi:10.3390/admsci7010006
Lennox,
A. & Stewart, D.A. (1983). Sweet dreams (are made of this) [Recorded by Eurythmics].
On Sweet dreams (are made of this) [MP3
file]. New York, NY: RCA Records.
Northouse,
P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Quinn,
R.E. (2008). Deep Change: Discovering the
Leader Within (1st ed.) [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/
Rath,
T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0. New
York: Gallup Press.
Rittel,
H.W.J. & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.
External Link
Leadership Philosophy
External Link
Leadership Philosophy
No comments:
Post a Comment